How Much Do Music Streaming Platforms Pay Artists Per Stream in 2025? (Including SoundCloud)

The music industry has transformed dramatically in the digital age, with streaming platforms—known as Digital Service Providers (DSPs)—now dominating how listeners access music. For artists, platforms like Spotify, Apple Music, Tidal, SoundCloud, and others offer global reach but come with complex and often controversial payout structures. This in-depth blog article explores the per-stream royalty rates of major DSPs in 2025, including SoundCloud, and provides insights into how artists can maximize their earnings in this evolving landscape.

Understanding Streaming Payouts: The Basics

Streaming royalties differ from traditional album sales or digital downloads, where artists earn a fixed amount per unit. Instead, DSPs use intricate models to calculate payouts, influenced by several factors:
Pro-Rata Model: Most DSPs pool their revenue (from subscriptions and ads) and distribute it to rights holders based on their share of total streams. For example, if your song accounts for 1% of Spotify’s streams in a month, you receive 1% of the allocated revenue.

User-Centric Model: Some platforms, like Deezer and SoundCloud’s Fan-Powered Royalties, allocate a subscriber’s payment only to the artists they stream, benefiting niche acts with loyal fans.

Key Variables: Subscription Tier: Premium streams (from paid plans) pay more than ad-supported streams.

Geographic Location: Streams from high-cost markets (e.g., US, UK) yield higher payouts than those from lower-cost regions (e.g., India, Brazil).

Contracts: Labels or distributors take a cut (often 20–80%), leaving artists with a fraction of the per-stream rate unless they’re independent.

Platform Revenue Share: DSPs typically keep 30–35% of revenue before distributing the rest.

With this context, let’s break down the per-stream payout rates for major DSPs in 2025, including SoundCloud royalties.

Per-Stream Payout Rates for Major DSPs in 2025

The figures below are approximate averages, as payouts vary due to regional differences, subscription tiers, and contract terms. These rates reflect what rights holders receive, not necessarily the artist’s final take after label or distributor cuts.

  1. Tidal: $0.01284–$0.0133 per stream
    Tidal remains a top payer, offering $0.01284–$0.0133 per stream. Artists need roughly 76–80 streams to earn $1 or 76,000 streams for $1,000.
    Why Tidal Pays More: Tidal’s premium subscription model (HiFi and HiFi Plus tiers) and smaller user base (under 9 million subscribers) result in higher per-stream rates. Its focus on high-fidelity audio attracts audiophiles willing to pay more.

Challenges: Tidal’s limited market share reduces its reach compared to Spotify or Apple Music.

Notable Features: Tidal’s Tidal Rising program supports emerging artists, but its Direct-to-Artist Payment program was discontinued, shifting focus to new talent initiatives.

  1. Apple Music: $0.00783–$0.01 per stream
    Apple Music pays $0.00783–$0.01 per stream, requiring 100–125 streams for $1 or 100,000–125,000 streams for $1,000.
    Why Competitive: With no free tier, all Apple Music streams come from paid subscriptions, and the platform allocates ~52% of revenue to rights holders.

Advantages: Its 75 million tracks, lossless audio, and integration into the Apple ecosystem (e.g., Siri, HomePod) boost exposure. Apple Music Pro tools help artists track performance and pitch for playlists.

Considerations: Payouts vary by region, with higher rates in wealthier markets.

  1. SoundCloud Royalties: $0.0025–$0.004 per stream (Fan-Powered Royalties)

    SoundCloud’s payouts range from $0.0025 to $0.004 per stream under its Fan-Powered Royalties model, requiring 250–400 streams for $1 or 250,000–400,000 streams for $1,000.
    Fan-Powered Royalties: Introduced in 2021, this user-centric model distributes a subscriber’s payment (from SoundCloud Go or Go+ plans) only to the artists they stream. This benefits independent and niche artists with dedicated fans.

Why Lower Payouts: SoundCloud’s large free-tier user base and lower subscription fees (e.g., $5.99–$9.99/month for Go/Go+) result in smaller revenue pools compared to Tidal or Apple Music.

Strengths: With over 320 million tracks and a community-driven platform, SoundCloud excels for discovery, especially for indie artists, DJs, and remixers. Its SoundCloud Premier program offers monetization for eligible creators.

Challenges: Only paid subscribers contribute to Fan-Powered Soundcloud Royalties, and the platform’s ad-supported streams pay less. Artists need a SoundCloud Pro or Pro Unlimited plan to access full monetization features.

  1. Amazon Music: $0.00402–$0.0096 per stream

    Amazon Music pays $0.00402–$0.0096 per stream, depending on the subscription tier. Artists need 250–366 streams for $1 or 235,000–366,000 streams for $1,000.
    Why the Range?: Streams from Amazon Music Unlimited pay higher (up to $0.0096), while Prime Music streams pay less (~$0.00139). Independent artists report higher rates when owning their rights.

Advantages: Integration with Alexa and Amazon’s growing subscriber base (part of Amazon Prime’s 200 million+ users) boosts reach. High-definition audio appeals to quality-conscious listeners.

Drawbacks: Lower payouts for Prime streams and regional variations reduce earnings in some markets.

  1. YouTube Music: $0.00069–$0.008 per stream

    YouTube Music offers $0.00069–$0.008 per stream, requiring 125–1,450 streams for $1 or 125,000–1,450,000 streams for $1,000.
    Why Low?: Its ad-supported model and massive user base (2 billion+ monthly users) dilute payouts. Premium streams pay more (~$0.005–$0.007), but Content ID streams (e.g., music in user videos) pay as little as $0.00087.

Advantages: YouTube’s algorithm and global reach make it a discovery powerhouse. Artists can earn from video views and monetized content.

Challenges: Low payouts make it less viable for revenue, requiring massive stream counts.

  1. Spotify: $0.0029–$0.005 per stream

    Spotify, with 626 million users, pays $0.0029–$0.005 per stream, needing 230–345 streams for $1 or 285,000–345,000 streams for $1,000.
    Why Lower Rates: Spotify’s 209 million free-tier users and growth in low-cost markets (e.g., $1.13/month in Turkey) reduce per-stream payouts. Premium streams pay more but are diluted by the pro-rata model.

Benefits: Spotify’s playlists (e.g., Discover Weekly) and Spotify for Artists tools drive discovery. Its scale offers unmatched exposure.

Criticism: Artists need ~4.1 million streams annually to earn a US minimum wage ($15,080), sparking debates about fairness.

  1. Deezer: $0.0064–$0.007 per stream

    Deezer pays $0.0064–$0.007 per stream, requiring 143–178 streams for $1 or 143,000–178,000 streams for $1,000.
    User-Centric Model: Deezer’s Pay Who You Play system allocates subscriber payments to streamed artists, favoring smaller acts.

Market Position: With 16 million users and 73 million tracks, Deezer is strong in Europe but less dominant globally.

Considerations: Payouts vary by region, and its smaller user base limits reach.

  1. Pandora: $0.0013–$0.0027 per stream

    Pandora pays $0.0013–$0.0027 per stream, needing 752–1,107 streams for $1 or 752,000–1,107,000 streams for $1,000.
    Why Low?: Its radio-style model and ad-supported streams result in lower payouts. Premium streams pay slightly more.

Niche Appeal: Popular in the US, Pandora’s personalized stations have a smaller global footprint.

Strategy: Use Pandora as a supplementary revenue source.

  1. Napster: $0.019–$0.021 per stream

    Napster pays $0.019–$0.021 per stream, requiring 48–53 streams for $1 or 48,000–53,000 streams for $1,000.
    High Payer: Despite its small user base, Napster’s payouts are among the highest, making it a hidden gem.

Limitations: Delayed payments (3–6 months) and limited reach reduce its impact.

Potential: Ideal for artists with dedicated fans.

  1. Qobuz: $0.0136 per stream

    Qobuz pays $0.0136 per stream, needing 74 streams for $1 or 74,000 streams for $1,000.
    Audiophile Focus: Its lossless audio and premium model attract high-paying subscribers.

Niche Market: Qobuz’s smaller user base limits exposure but offers top-tier payouts.

Strategy: Optimize tracks for high-quality playback to target Qobuz’s audience.

  1. Peloton: $0.03 per stream

    Peloton pays an impressive $0.03 per stream, requiring 34 streams for $1 or 34,000 streams for $1,000.
    Why High?: Its curated catalog and premium model (tied to exercise equipment) result in high payouts.

Limitations: Accessible only to Peloton users, limiting its reach.

Opportunity: Pitch to Peloton’s curators for workout playlist inclusion.

Comparing DSPs: Who Pays the Most?

Here’s a ranking of music streaming platforms (DSPs) by per-stream payout (highest to lowest, 2025 averages): With #1 paying the most to artists.

  • 1. Peloton: $0.03 per stream
  • 2. Napster: $0.019–$0.021 per stream
  • 3. Qobuz: $0.0136 per stream
  • 4. Tidal: $0.01284–$0.0133
  • 5. Apple Music: $0.00783–$0.01
  • 6. Amazon Music: $0.00402–$0.0096
  • 7. Deezer: $0.0064–$0.007
  • 8. Spotify: $0.0029–$0.005
  • 9. SoundCloud: $0.0025–$0.004
  • 10. Pandora: $0.0013–$0.0027
  • 11.YouTube Music: $0.00069–$0.008

Peloton and Napster lead, but their small audiences make Tidal, Qobuz, and Apple Music more practical. Spotify, SoundCloud, and YouTube Music prioritize exposure over payouts.


Factors Impacting Artist Earnings

Artists often earn less than expected due to:

Label/Distributor Cuts: Labels take 50–80%, while distributors like DistroKid charge 0–20%. Independent artists keep more.

Regional Variations: Streams from the US pay more than those from India due to subscription price differences.

Free vs. Premium Streams: Ad-supported streams (e.g., Spotify free, SoundCloud Go) pay less than premium streams.

Playlist Placement: Curated playlists drive streams but may come from lower-paying free tiers.

Royalty Types: Artists earn mechanical (streaming) and performance (public play) royalties, requiring registration with a PRO (e.g., ASCAP).

Strategies to Maximize Streaming Revenue


Distribute Widely: Use distributors like DistroKid or TuneCore to reach all DSPs, including SoundCloud, Tidal, and Qobuz.

Target High-Paying Platforms: Promote Tidal, Qobuz, and Apple Music to fans willing to pay for premium subscriptions.

Leverage SoundCloud: Use SoundCloud’s Fan-Powered Royalties and SoundCloud Premier to monetize dedicated fans. Engage its community with remixes and exclusives.

Encourage Premium Streams: Direct fans to paid tiers (e.g., SoundCloud Go+, Spotify Premium) for higher payouts.

Pitch for Playlists: Submit to Spotify, Apple Music, and SoundCloud playlists to boost streams.

Use Analytics: Track performance via Spotify for Artists, SoundCloud Premier, or distributor dashboards.

Diversify Income: Combine streaming with live shows, merch, sync licensing, and platforms like Bandcamp.

Explore Niche DSPs: Pitch to Peloton or Qobuz for high payouts if your music fits their audience.

The Bigger Picture: Is Streaming Sustainable?

Streaming accounts for 83% of music consumption in key markets and generated $16.9 billion globally in 2021. Yet, many artists struggle:

Spotify: ~4.1 million streams/year for US minimum wage ($15,080).

SoundCloud: ~3.75–6 million streams/year for the same, due to lower payouts but user-centric benefits.

Napster: ~896,600 streams/year, showing high-payer potential.

SoundCloud’s Fan-Powered Royalties offer hope for indie artists, but its reliance on paid subscribers limits earnings. Tidal and Qobuz lead in fairness, but Spotify and SoundCloud dominate discovery. Systemic changes—like higher subscription fees or broader user-centric models—may be needed for sustainability.


Navigating the Streaming Ecosystem

In 2025, DSP payouts vary widely. Peloton ($0.03), Napster ($0.019–$0.021), Qobuz ($0.0136), and Tidal ($0.01284–$0.0133) offer the highest rates, while Spotify ($0.0029–$0.005), SoundCloud ($0.0025–$0.004), and YouTube Music ($0.00069–$0.008) prioritize reach over revenue.

SoundCloud’s user-centric model benefits indie artists but requires a dedicated fan base and paid subscribers to maximize earnings. Artists must distribute widely, target high-paying platforms, and diversify income to thrive.

What’s your experience with streaming royalties? Are you an artist leveraging SoundCloud for royalties? or a fan curious about supporting musicians? Drop your thoughts below!


Discover more from EDM RANKS

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *